🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.